A Poem for empress julz (EJ)

[vceg]

Dr Luv,

You can't even come up with your own sentences? You copied my statements about you from my posting below


http://www.usj.com.my/bulletin/uploa...?threadid=4171


I recognised it immediately upon reading your posting !!!!

[christopherngg]

Thanks Folks for making things straight.....

For your info.....this may be my last post....as I got a PM message from KWChang....BANNING me from ever joining this web forum..

For I am thinking the other 2 punks would get the same treatment....sure?

Its alright...no problem...the good shall always prevails over evil!!!

Take care and A-LO-HA,

Other than the 2 + 1 Young Punks....

....if anyone else feels offended....sorry.

....my remarks are purely for getting back at the 2 + 1 punks...for disrespecting EJ or the female members.


chris.

[qubex]

To the original poster:

You are a pathetic little loser who deserves to slither down the toilet just as any other excrement deserves to. You are so pitiful and spiteful, such a loser in your own life, that you feel the need to come online and fling dirt under the guise of an assumed persona (and, I'll bet, a misappropriated Internet connection). You're such a coward that the only way you can feel the thrill of being alive is by reaching into someone else's mind and twisting, causing pain for your own delight.

Fear not, you'll have your comeuppance one day, and I'm not referring to bad karma.

To the moderators:

You have no balls. I feel really sorry for you all. You should have dealt with this affirmatively right from the beginning rather than being so ineffectual. How you could live with yourselves having chosen to leave a member of your community defenceless in the light of such a lurid attack I cannot understand. You have truly disgraced yourselves and you've let down all the decent frequenters of this forum.

[kwchang]

As I have mentioned at least once in the past, do not bring personal arguments online. We have the PM (not Pak Lah, Private Messaging ) to handle that. I have also told EJ personally that I am an old man and I do not move as quickly as I used to, hence my being "ineffectual" and perhaps totally incompetent to a lot of people. As for my balls, I guess they are the first to disappear with old age. So what pleasure does it give you, my gwailo friend, to tell my neighbours of my predicament? But then again, I shall be ineffectual once more and allow your comments to pass ALTHOUGH I had been taught well (by EJ) to IMMEDIATELY BAN anyone who spout such comments in our public Forum. However, this is only the one chance you have to do that because we feel you have your right to your opinion.

As Ginaphan has told me and also mentioned in another thread, our Forum has regressed to boxing rings. I agree with her. However, do remember that we do not administer or moderate for a living. I work during the day and tend to my children's school-work in the evenings. Many times I get online only way past midnight just to check that the other 'KIDS' on the Forum haven't made a mess of this playground. It is unfortunate that we have people who abuse their stay.

You know, we were so proud of the type of Forum crowd that we started with. We had responsible citizens coming on to use this platform for their community messages. There was a lot of self-censorship, tolerance and plain good neighbourliness. If my memory is not going into athrophy like my other body parts, I would say that somehow we had some misfits infiltrating the Forum in the past year. We stuck to our strong believe in non-censorship but it created this rot we see now.

Too much talk, I'll continue in a little while....

[qubex]

It could well be that you did not remove the post in time because you had not yet seen it.

However if I am not incorrect, there was a post made by none other than a fellow moderator where it was made clear that the choice to leave the thread in its place was no less than a policy decision "to demonstrate what an idiot the original poster is" (my paraphrasal).

I would personally be embarassed to be associated with that kind of policy decision. This individual has made open threats before now and is now posting this kind of sick material singling out a single person - namely, Empress Julz - as a chosen victim. As moderators, you all have a moral responsability to ensure the wellbeing of your readership, and I hate to say this but at the very least you have let EJ (and many other decent and less controversial characters) down.

I, too, am an Administrator on an Internet forum, so I can well identify with the kinds of difficulties you find yourselves faced with. However, I would never forgive myself for allowing a member, no matter how unpopular he or she may be, to be denigrated publicly in such a manner.

To my way of thinking, you (as an aggregate whole, I am not necessarily personalising here) have traded EJ's dignity in exchange of avoiding a (possibly) unpopular decision, and that is disgraceful. I am truly disappointed. If that disappointment caused me to be more offensive than was called for then I apologise, but I stand by my words. Feel free to ban me if you think that is the correct course of action, but I feel that compared to the multiple misdeeds of Dr_Luv this single post pales in comparison.

[kwchang]

Fellow readers, I have erred.
To the ladies who have been offended, I tender my apologies.

Yes, I was slow to Dr-Luv's agendas. In the past we did have such smart-alec nobodies who tested the waters of our Forum. However, in those days, the other Forum members generally side-stepped such droppings. Peace usually prevailed. In the recent developments with Dr_Luv, my poor memory tells me that EJ started to defend herself online and prolonged the harassment. We thought (in hind-sight, wrongly) that such issues would resolve themselves as it did in the early days. As you know, with EJ holding court, this was not to be. Once the argument developed, I felt that I could not BAN Dr_Luv without also banning EJ because both were argueing online (not using the PM system). To be fair, we should have banned both. Of course, that would bring all EJ's supporters down on my neck. So, I tried talking them down offline, with warnings. Things toned down over the Christmas holidays as you may remember....

By the way, as of this afternoon, we have banned Dr_Luv AND Christopherngg. I have not banned people before and we had some hiccups along the way - I guess they are finally out for good since 7pm today.

So folks, we will now change our policy of being lenient to our guests who overstep their freedom of speech. There shall be no fear or favour. We shall remove your right to be our guest if you misbehave. Be an adult and you shall carry on as before. I am sure most people know what to do.

Do tell us if you do not agree.

Please note that I have started another thread on How to moderate this forum? The link is at -
http://www.usj.com.my/bulletin/uploa...?threadid=4376

You may wish to add your comments there.

[jeffooi]

Chang... sorry for budging in.

There are people who mistook your magnamity for your
weakness.

I strongly suggest you consider the option of sending
the three parties - namely dr_luv, christophernng and EJ -
on a holiday, and save this community forum from further
agony of having to put up with their squabbles.

I noticed some of neighbours have sounded their concern
over the serenity of this e-neighbourhood being threatened.

The trio, who I considered joint-and-several contributed
to the ruckus, have to determine for themselves whether
they would like to ride on a one-way ticket or otherwise.

We should take cognizance that this community is not
compatible with their standards, hence their criticism.

But it's entirely their right to freedom of expression
and it's their choice to come in or to leave this e-space.

But, while they are in, they need to respect the sanctity
of our little village here. They can't come in, throw a noisy
party and blame the entire neighbourhood for staring at
them.

Chang, we are sorry we put you in such a thankless
position. So, you owe us no apology.

In fact, you own the infamous trio no apology.

As for qubex, whosoever logging in from Guangdong
and whosoever proclaimed to be an Internet forum
moderator, you may like to offer him your appreciation
of his opinion, but let him be known that you are not
beholden in whatsoever way to his moral yardstick.

Most of all, tell him we just need level-headed
neighbours in our community.

We don't need a pope.

[vounfair1]

KWCHANG, PM IS PRIVATE YES? SO HOW COME YOU CALL OUT TO PEOPLE WHO ISSUED A PUBLIC STATEMENT OR THREAD IN THE FIRST PLACE AND SHOULD THEN RESORT TO YOUR PM FOR THEIR BOXING SESSIONS.

IF THE ONE DARES(DRAWS FIRST BLOOD) ANOTHER IN AN OPEN FORUM TO PUT UP A FIGHT WITH HIM, HE DESERVES TO BE GET BACK FIRED ON HIS OWN FACE OR A.S. OPENLY YES?

IN BETWEEN IF YOU DIDN'T WANT IT THAT WAY, WHY DID YOU WANT TO SIT BACK AND WATCH THE FIGHT INSTEAD?

YOU CALL YOUR SELF A TRUE MODERATOR ON THIS TASTELESS POEM STATEMENT CASE AGAINST A WOMAN.

IF SO, YOU ARE ONLY A BIT BETTER THAN THE INSULTOR HIMSELF YES? IN THE LEGAL WORLD YOU MIGHT BE ACCUSED FOR BEING IN CONTEMPT.

OH BEFORE I LOST IT, IF YOU REALLY WANT TO KNOW WHO I AM, FIRST PLEASE GET MY AGE CORRECTED,


VOUNFAIR1.

P/S: IN ALL FAIRNESS YOU SHOULD NOT DOUBT OR PROVE ME TO BE WHO I AM OR AM NOT, ITS GOING TO BE A WASTE OF YOUR POTENTIALLY USEFUL TIME TO DO SOMETHING TO IMPROVE YOUR WORK.

[kwchang]

Am locking this thread since issues are discussed in another.