Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: MCMC blurred by cow's head?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Subang USJ
    Posts
    586

    MCMC blurred by cow's head?

    from http://www.jeffooi.com/2009/09/littl...s.php#comments

    Dear MCMC (c/o - Abdul Halim Ahmad)

    Under Section 211/233 of the Communication and Multimedia Act 1998, you found the content of the video to be indecent, obscene, false, menacing, or offensive in character with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any person ... SHOULD MCMC BE MAKING A POLICE REPORT AND CHARGE THE CONTENT PROVIDER??!! instead of Malaysiakini for putting up the video.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    from USJ to Shah Alam
    Posts
    1,435
    now the blame pushed to the messenger... do they practice 'super tai-chi' in bee end?

    anyway, i should just keep quiet too....

    sorry to Mr Chang
    Last edited by jimmyay; 04-09-2009 at 10:44 PM.
    Live Happily & Leave Peacefully.
    (It doesn't come without a fight)
    *Sit & Protest - BERSIH 3.0*

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    In PJ Now
    Posts
    2,335
    I agree that the content of the videos is extremely offensive. Therefore action should be taken against the perpetrators of what transpired in the videos; not against the whistleblowers and exposers of the offense.

    A very clumsy attempt at a cover-up and another own goal scored.

    Meanwhile, folks are putting up mirrors for the videos, and adding this latest stunt by the enforcers - guaranteeing that the offense will gain even more coverage and exposure than it already has.
    Bob Kee
    bobjots : redux
    "The hottest place in hell is reserved for those who remain neutral in moral crisis" - Dante


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •