Cybertroopers and trouble makers

[Chia Hak Soon]

Admin note - this was split from " YB Jeff, where is the spending report?"

The way I see it in this thread is a clear invasion of cybertroopers in to usj.com and by way of proxies. If I were you Mr. Chang, follow the previous Selangor MB's reply " Semua-nya O.K." and closed this thread.

[simon_tan]

Sure, close the thread.. in fact, just close one eye... for as long as we accept different standards.. semua nya ok.

[bslee]

I think KWChang should have new forum membership subjected to approval hereon. I'm certainly not in favor of malicious cybertroopers, infantiles and juveniles lurking in this forum. Many Yahoo groups insist on membership approval.

[kwchang]

I think KWChang should have new forum membership subjected to approval ..

Good idea ... but how to check on new subscribers? would appreciate workable solutions. Anyone can come on as goody-goody and metamorphose later to the devil within. Even job interviews cannot filter types of personalities effectively, much less a virtual environment.

Perhaps the better solution is to impose a 2nd level of banana plantation where problematic members gets ejected after building a bad record online. However, I'm a poor judge of character ... so how?

[tsd]

Admin note - this was split from " YB Jeff, where is the spending report?"

The way I see it in this thread is a clear invasion of cybertroopers in to usj.com and by way of proxies. If I were you Mr. Chang, follow the previous Selangor MB's reply " Semua-nya O.K." and closed this thread.

are you saying that anyone who critisize YB Jeff is branded as a cybertrooper ? In this case, I would rather be a cybertrooper than a "yes man". Just because we voted for opposition, it does not mean we wont critisize the opposition and we will support everything they do blindly.... else we will create another BN.

How YB Jeff response to the comments it is up to him... it will either earn him more votes or lose more votes.

[pepsi]

Good idea ... but how to check on new subscribers? would appreciate workable solutions. Anyone can come on as goody-goody and metamorphose later to the devil within. Even job interviews cannot filter types of personalities effectively, much less a virtual environment.

Perhaps the better solution is to impose a 2nd level of banana plantation where problematic members gets ejected after building a bad record online. However, I'm a poor judge of character ... so how?

Dear KWchang, when you mentioned you are a "poor judge of character" does it applies to everyone, ones you know personally and those you have never met but writes into the forum
So far, you are doing a great job as a moderator, making sure the debate is civil and not racially based, which would cause national unrest .
You give us all fair warnings and allow us to defend our case before proceeding with a banana and a ban.

You don't have to stress yourself figuring out who is a cyber trooper, a juvenile or a delinquent . The readers can judge for themselves.

p/s Just a suggestion. You might want to consider that we all register and we all place our actual photos on the avatar.
I can imagine you wouldn't hear from quite a number of people after that, it might get rather quite than

[bslee]

For a start, Member application with Name as in Mykad, number, address, and maybe a paragraph of self introduction for a start to KWChang. Details only for the mod to know and NO ONE else. Mod to list out essential T & C being a member will be held totally responsible and postings found pointing to mischief(leave it for you to figure what kind) on the forum. Of course mod serves delicious bananas at all times.

[rachel sj]

For a start, Member application with Name as in Mykad, number, address, and maybe a paragraph of self introduction for a start to KWChang. Details only for the mod to know and NO ONE else. Mod to list out essential T & C being a member will be held totally responsible and postings found pointing to mischief(leave it for you to figure what kind) on the forum. Of course mod serves delicious bananas at all times.

I think it's a bit hard to impose the need of having to submit infos of Mykad (Data Privacy Act) but it's a good idea to make new applicant to read and accept T & C which should include disclaimer by Moderator from any responsibility/laibility of members' statment or even to include indemnity clause whereby members undertake to indemnify moderator from any costs/damages suffered/incurred as a result of members' act before proceeding to allow thier participation in this forum...

[tsd]

if the cybertroopers wants to join, just let them join... I dont see any problem with that. Let them participate and be convinced to abandon their political master. If they make trouble, then our admin can give them banana.

[ginaphan]

I agree. I have no problems with the current setup (but of course, I am not a moderator). That's what openness is. I don't think we should brand everyone as a cybertrooper just because they don't follow the majority here.

Asking for mykad number et al goes against the grain of the foundation that this forum is built on. So far, we have proven to be a very responsible community (hiccups now and then accepted) even when when posting in cognito.

But if you think they are cybertroopers, then be wise and not fall into their trap. Discern first before reacting.

[Shaneburger]

are you saying that anyone who critisize YB Jeff is branded as a cybertrooper ? In this case, I would rather be a cybertrooper than a "yes man". Just because we voted for opposition, it does not mean we wont critisize the opposition and we will support everything they do blindly.... else we will create another BN.

How YB Jeff response to the comments it is up to him... it will either earn him more votes or lose more votes.

tsd has a point, I've been following the thread and asked Jeff to fulfilled his election pledges as well, so that gets me blacklisted? fbog

[pepsi]

For a start, Member application with Name as in Mykad, number, address, and maybe a paragraph of self introduction for a start to KWChang. Details only for the mod to know and NO ONE else. Mod to list out essential T & C being a member will be held totally responsible and postings found pointing to mischief(leave it for you to figure what kind) on the forum. Of course mod serves delicious bananas at all times.

When ISA was introduced, it was said it's objective was very clear, so .......it's what it is today.( Note ......means it's your own personal opinion of course whether you are for the ISA or not.)
So what is construed as mischief better be very, very clear or it may lead to misinterpretation .
The banana plantation might become a cyber Kem Kamunting.

[pepsi]

tsd has a point, I've been following the thread and asked Jeff to fulfilled his election pledges as well, so that gets me blacklisted? fbog

Nah, you ain't blacklisted . KWChang and BSLee are formulating a national security checkpoint to ensure no one with any bad intent or mischief will threathen our national security by inciting racial and religious propaganda or the forum's security. Also, to ensure everyone behave in a civil manner towards each other.
That is why KWChang separated the thread, different topic altogether.

[coogee]

tsd has a point, I've been following the thread and asked Jeff to fulfilled his election pledges as well, so that gets me blacklisted? fbog

Looks like I am going to the gas chamber as well....seems to be "either you are with us or against us" mentality here. So BN....and straight to Kamunting since the banana plantation does not seems to work on us incalcitrants.

[jararaca]

If USJ forum wanna to be successful with active participations. It must be opens to ideas of all kind. Views and criticisms must be allowed.

This is especially true for blogs. Failing which visitors will leave as their voices are not heard and your forum dies of natural death.

Even now USJ is extremely slow. No wonder JO couldn't even be bother.