Using forum to spread rumour by trying to confirm them here
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 49

Thread: Using forum to spread rumour by trying to confirm them here

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    USJ 12
    Posts
    4,479

    Using forum to spread rumour by trying to confirm them here

    It is terribly unjust and wrong to spread such a rumour and you are spreading a rumour. Not only is your post in very poor taste but you are insulting the memory of the girl.
    You are trying to fan a non-existing fire in the Kedah case by bringing in totally unsubstantiated materials and now you are trying to justify yourself by saying you want more concrete proof? You can get concrete proof by lighting and fanning a fire? Yeah. I also keep on hearing people mentioning that if you cross breed an imbecile with another imbecile, you will produce an Einstein.
    I agree with the above statement by Jose Mourinho. Unfortunately he has been misunderstood by his last statement and was accused of slandering and got bananaed (by now he has overtaken Joe Gomez on this) when he was not referring to anyone in particular when he used the word 'imbecile.' He was not even implying anything at all.

    I suggest that forumers should not post in this forum unsubstantiated statements and negative speculations what we term as rumours or hearsay and then ask people here whether we have heard of them. By doing so, the forumer unfortunately is actually spreading the rumour on a greater and faster scale unknowingly. I found that in some of the past postings, they have tarnished the image of the person or the organisations who are unfortunate enough to be absent from here to defend themselves. In the court of law, the lawyers would have objected and asked the court to expunge such heresay.
    IP

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Bandar Sunway
    Posts
    2,616
    Quote Originally Posted by pcyeoh
    ...................and got bananaed (by now he has overtaken Joe Gomez on this) ..................
    Always wanted to be benchmarked for something or other ... anything at all ........ Being bananaed shd do it ........ thks pc .....
    IP

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    USJ
    Posts
    13,830
    http://www.usj.com.my/bulletin/uploa...9&postcount=19

    http://www.usj.com.my/bulletin/uploa...2&postcount=25

    http://www.usj.com.my/bulletin/uploa...9&postcount=27

    http://www.usj.com.my/bulletin/uploa...4&postcount=31

    Err...dear PCYeoh...you may have misunderstood...our fellow forumer is sent to the banana plantation again...after he resorted to name calling fellow forumers Arbiter n to similar extent Handyman...as a Canis...as in a fox...wolf n a dog...n as badly to the previous extent of slandering the earlier fellow forumer...

    Ahem...irrespective of your concern of rumour spreading is bad which Orchi tends to agree with you on that point ONLY...the matter could have easily been avoided...IF the fellow forumer concerned...would have just given off a gentle caution of it instead...to begin with.
    Last edited by orchipalar; 22-06-2006 at 12:54 PM.
    IP

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Chelsea
    Posts
    1,953
    Quote Originally Posted by orchipalar
    ....after he resorted to name calling fellow forumers Arbiter n to similar extent Handyman...as a Canis...as in a fox...wolf n a dog...n as badly to the previous extent of slandering the earlier fellow forumer...
    I just quoted you but I shall not lower my self dignity and respect to even answer your usual psuedo-wisdom.

    KWChang mentioned that (perhaps) I like the banana plantation. Janelim also mentioned in one of her posts that I have received a lot of bananas. PCYeoh mentioned it also. Joe Gomez indirectly mentioned it also. Actually, what is a banana? It is worth something if it is worth something but when a banana or a ban is dished out on selective persecution basis, then it is a joke on the person who dishes them out. It is of no consequence to me.

    And I thank you, Orchipalar, not to reply me and make references to my post (I believe your good friend KWChang did mention once that if we don't like each other's posts, then don't read and don't comment and so far I have stayed away from you as if you have leprosy - whether you have or not is of no consequence to me) because your hysteria doesn't impress nor interest me.

    Last edited by Jose Mourinho; 22-06-2006 at 01:25 PM.
    IP

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Chelsea
    Posts
    1,953
    I still want to stress on rumour-mongering:

    Quote Originally Posted by swee_ann-tweety
    say does anyone know what happened to the Kedah girl who went jogging, got raped and killed case?

    Rumours has it that some VIP's son tried courting her but he failed.
    so he hired few guys to kidnap her.
    then this VIP's son raped her and so did the gang and then later killed her.
    rumours has it that since he cannot have her, no one else could....

    sigh! that's rumous but has anyone hear of this same rumour ?
    I will now follow the exact pattern posted by this rumour monger (noted that I said 'monger' and not 'mongrel'):

    say does anyone know what happened to the tweedle-dee and tweedle-dum who went jogging, got raped and killed case?

    Rumours has it that some VIP's son who is a gay tried courting them but he failed so he hired a few guys to kidnap them.
    then this VIPS's son raped them and so did the gang and then later killed them. rumours has it that since he cannot have them, no one else could...

    sigh! that's rumous but has anyone hear of this same rumour ?
    I can start a rumour on any forumer (for example, a rumour on KWChang and Orchi in a banana plantation, or anybody in this world and then justify myself by saying that I just want to ask so that I can have concrete proof and that usj.forum is the place where I can get answers before and the admin/mod will be so overwhelmed with this shallow praise then he goes along with it? Same as he went along with Swee-Ann and actually said that he/she was right and I was wrong to disagree with him/her. I quoted from KWChang's post : "Jose. To be fair, swee-ann was probably trying to get answers as she had clarified earlier that she realised that usj dot com had answers for another similar incident"

    Yes. People who doesn't understand the word 'fairness' should never utter it in case it blows up in his face.

    Last edited by Jose Mourinho; 22-06-2006 at 01:29 PM.
    IP

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    USJ
    Posts
    327
    I appreciate all the help that members of the Forum (including you) are giving me to moderate the Forum but there need to be clear delineations of job-specifications. It may appear that I am sleeping on the job but I assure you that my style of administration is still my style. At the end of the day, the problems will be tackled. Hence I do appreciate some level of patience. If at any one time, you think I have missed a dismeanor, do PM me - the mechanics of the process are provided. Please leave me to handle the people who go off track or make unsavoury statements. My final decision may not be exactly to your liking but then, we can't have everything exactly the way we want it. ------- by kwchang

    kwchang, you misread Jose's post again. Many times you failed in this area of misinterpretation. Jose was having a disagreement with swee-ann. But you jumped the gun again (as usual) and gave the impression that he is after your job. You can hold on tight to your moderator post...but insecurity keeps you jumping up and down.
    And may I know what makes you think that swee-ann is a "she".???
    IP

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Somewhere in SJ
    Posts
    622
    The only time i venture into this part of the forum when i find the other sections of the forum boring and dry.
    IP

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    subang
    Posts
    44
    Quote Originally Posted by Jose Mourinho
    I still want to stress on rumour-mongering:

    I will now follow the exact pattern posted by this rumour monger (noted that I said 'monger' and not 'mongrel'):

    I can start a rumour on any forumer (for example, a rumour on KWChang and Orchi in a banana plantation, or anybody in this world and then justify myself by saying that I just want to ask so that I can have concrete proof and that usj.forum is the place where I can get answers before and the admin/mod will be so overwhelmed with this shallow praise then he goes along with it? Same as he went along with Swee-Ann and actually said that he/she was right and I was wrong to disagree with him/her. I quoted from KWChang's post : "Jose. To be fair, swee-ann was probably trying to get answers as she had clarified earlier that she realised that usj dot com had answers for another similar incident"

    Yes. People who doesn't understand the word 'fairness' should never utter it in case it blows up in his face.
    You repeatedly use the forum for your own selfish purposes and ill intentions stooping so low as to attack the moderators and forumers with your so called sarcastic & intelligent "wisdom", rather than addressing the issues amicably & conducting yourself properly. I can only see you as a trouble maker, nothing that you can say that will refute that reality!

    But you are so lucky that you cd still exist in this forum, outside of which, tables & chairs wd be flying for sure!


    IP

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Pj
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Ginger
    You repeatedly use the forum for your own selfish purposes and ill intentions stooping so low as to attack the moderators and forumers with your so called sarcastic & intelligent "wisdom", rather than addressing the issues amicably & conducting yourself properly. I can only see you as a trouble maker, nothing that you can say that will refute that reality!

    But you are so lucky that you cd still exist in this forum, outside of which, tables & chairs wd be flying for sure!


    Cut the crap. You have an issue with Jose Mourinho, please Private Message him or the Administrator directly. This forum, I believe, is not meant for you to pursue your personal vendetta in whatever nickname you use. I read a lot about trolls and I certainly hope you're not one, be it sanctioned or unsanctioned. I'm not playing moderator. You should not play judge.
    IP

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    USJ 12
    Posts
    4,479
    Quote Originally Posted by Ginger
    You repeatedly use the forum for your own selfish purposes and ill intentions stooping so low as to attack the moderators and forumers with your so called sarcastic & intelligent "wisdom", rather than addressing the issues amicably & conducting yourself properly. I can only see you as a trouble maker, nothing that you can say that will refute that reality!

    But you are so lucky that you cd still exist in this forum, outside of which, tables & chairs wd be flying for sure!


    er er er...r another MCA meeting?? But the origin of flying chairs and tables belongs to the MIC. Sorry for the slight digression. It is also said that the good old days MIC had a 150% attendance everytime they held a meeting to discuss controversial issue - 100% from the members themselves and 50% from the FRU Police squad. Whether the tradition is carry on today will be seen at this weekend MIC Annual General Meeting which incidentally is also a election year.
    IP

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    subang
    Posts
    1,042
    the way its going , very soon moderators would have no choice but tighten up the registration procedures.
    IP

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    -
    Posts
    5,822
    Quote Originally Posted by idolfan
    the way its going , very soon moderators would have no choice but tighten up the registration procedures.
    Great idea idolfan
    IP

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    subang
    Posts
    44
    Quote Originally Posted by idolfan
    the way its going , very soon moderators would have no choice but tighten up the registration procedures.
    Yes. One of de way is to use house/office phone registration. Only de administrators hv access to the phone numbers. Just a suggestion. Rather than having someone creating dozens of nicks to create nothing but trouble!


    IP

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Pj
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Ginger
    Rather than having someone creating dozens of nicks to create nothing but trouble!
    You mean like maybe Mon (nice girl) could be Ginger (nasty girl) and vice versa, and maybe many more girly or manly nicks?

    Just a rough example with you as an exhibit if you don't mind. I'm sure you don't. Sorry if you do.
    IP

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    subang
    Posts
    44
    Quote Originally Posted by Clark Kent
    You mean like maybe Mon (nice girl) could be Ginger (nasty girl) and vice versa, and maybe many more girly or manly nicks?

    Just a rough example with you as an exhibit if you don't mind. I'm sure you don't. Sorry if you do.
    I hope you don't mean to slander me. I'm not about to waste my time on you. Please do not accuse me of somebody whom I'm not. You yourself should stop hallucinating.
    IP

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •