PDA

View Full Version : harassment in the thread on Petronas CEO



Mercure
21-07-2014, 08:45 AM
He is on the way out. If he is still in he will sing praises and have honey flowing from his lips.

Really ?? :rolleyes:


Do you know him ??

Are you related to him ??

He is a friend of yours ??

Have you worked with him before ??

You are his boss or ex-boss ??

Did you in any occasion (official or private), spoke to him before ???

If not, I think is good not to make sweeping allegation...

besitai2007
21-07-2014, 09:12 AM
Really ?? :rolleyes:


Do you know him ??

Are you related to him ??

He is a friend of yours ??

Have you worked with him before ??

You are his boss or ex-boss ??

Did you in any occasion (official or private), spoke to him before ???

If not, I think is good not to make sweeping allegation...
Aiyah! Don't accuse me lah! I don't want to start a flaming war. The first paragraph of the article points to rumours that he may be on the way out. Read this EDGE news: http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/first/295602-edge-weekly-petronas-president-speaks-out-fearlessly-amid-rumours-he-is-under-pressure-to-leave-fr.html

If a person is still in a company and wants to remain, will he bad mouth the company? Unless if you are on the way out, you will not normally bring out all the dirty linen in public ... that's human nature. Say for example, if you are presently employed in your company, will you openly criticize your boss? Do that and you're getting the boot!

Mercure
21-07-2014, 11:05 AM
Aiyah! Don't accuse me lah! I don't want to start a flaming war. The first paragraph of the article points to rumours that he may be on the way out. Read this EDGE news: http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/first/295602-edge-weekly-petronas-president-speaks-out-fearlessly-amid-rumours-he-is-under-pressure-to-leave-fr.html


There is no accusation from my post. Just want to know how you derived to your comment - " He is on the way out. If he is still in he will sing praises and have honey flowing from his lips."

From the link you provided, The Edge explicitly mentioned the word “rumour” that he may be leaving. As a responsible journalist, the writter did not say he is leaving, just based on market rumour that he may be on his way out. But you did not, you specifically said “ He is on the way out. “

Worse, you spewed character-assassination on him with your comment - " If he is still in he will sing praises and have honey flowing from his lips.

However, I can be wrong. Maybe you know him very well and that's why I asked a few questions in post #5.

If you don't know him, it is good you don't make sweeping allegation.

besitai2007
21-07-2014, 11:10 AM
Mercure

If your statements are not accusations I don't know what they are. What is wrong with saying he is on his way out? The rumours said so. The second statement is not a character assassination but stating what normally occurs if a person wants to remain in his post. I am also not making sweeping allegations as you said. It is your interpretation. Sentinel did say that this is the calm before the storm. You are entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to mine.

Mercure
21-07-2014, 11:14 AM
...If a person is still in a company and wants to remain, will he bad mouth the company? Unless if you are on the way out, you will not normally bring out all the dirty linen in public ... that's human nature. Say for example, if you are presently employed in your company, will you openly criticize your boss? Do that and you're getting the boot!

I am not sure where you worked before and what kind of working environment in your past.

Based on you comment above, I strongly think you have not worked a day in a corporate world before...

Just my opinion.

Mercure
21-07-2014, 11:16 AM
Mercure

If your statements are not accusations I don't know what they are. What is wrong with saying he is on his way out? The rumours said so. The second statement is not a character assassination but stating what normally occurs if a person wants to remain in his post. I am also not making sweeping allegations as you said. It is your interpretation. Sentinel did say that this is the calm before the storm. You are entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to mine.

Sure, no doubt and no dispute on this - " You are entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to mine"

I leave it to the Moderator with regard to your comment.

tupai
21-07-2014, 12:26 PM
Aiyah! ...Say for example, if you are presently employed in your company, will you openly criticize your boss? Do that and you're getting the boot!

AIyah! NOT All true lah! In my previous corp life, the company GM hated my guts and I found out later in a top management meeting, he had slandered and branded me a 'Maverick' and wanted me to be sacked (for not following certain idiotic personal emo decisions he made). But the MD countered 'Yang Berkhidmat TIU tupai is productive Maverick and makes money for the co...":heheheh:

I then face-off the GM and said this: "joe limahai, you and I are working for a very established 100yr old american gray monolitic company named XXXX, I dont work for a joe limahhai trading sole proprietor enterprise!! :mad:We are both professional employees and you just happened to be the GM. Period! You dont like me? fine, sack me and i will sue you and the company ass off!":mad:

of course, he didnt dare sack me but i didnt get increment for 2 years:eek: until he left for BAT (also as a low class 'prostitute' as he had many a time called those colleagues who had left for higher pay elsewhere) ...then the co also got a new angmo md. And he gave me the biggest increment plus a co car, maybe just so to prevent me form leaving after outlasting that joey limahai....apa lagi maverick mahu?:p

Yang Boleh TIUxlatotupai:heheheh:

besitai2007
21-07-2014, 12:51 PM
AIyah! NOT All true lah! In my previous corp life, the company GM hated my guts and I found out later in a top management meeting, he had slandered and branded me a 'Maverick' and wanted me to be sacked (for not following certain idiotic personal emo decisions he made). But the MD countered 'Yang Berkhidmat TIU tupai is productive Maverick and makes money for the co...":heheheh:

I then face-off the GM and said this: "joe limahai, you and I are working for a very established 100yr old american gray monolitic company named XXXX, I dont work for a joe limahhai trading sole proprietor enterprise!! :mad:We are both professional employees and you just happened to be the GM. Period! You dont like me? fine, sack me and i will sue you and the company ass off!":mad:

of course, he didnt dare sack me but i didnt get increment for 2 years:eek: until he left for BAT (also as a low class 'prostitute' as he had many a time called those colleagues who had left for higher pay elsewhere) ...then the co also got a new angmo md. And he gave me the biggest increment plus a co car, maybe just so to prevent me form leaving after outlasting that joey limahai....apa lagi maverick mahu?:p

Yang Boleh TIUxlatotupai:heheheh:
Ok good for you! I stand corrected.:) In the place where I work everyone hates the GM (a Datin). If you bad mouthed her, you're curtains, which was what one guy did. Your GM is made of different stuff for sure.

HTCHONG
21-07-2014, 07:24 PM
Chang, I don’t think you need to ban Mercure. I guess he has the right to get to the bottom of a rumour and nothing wrong to question if it is in doubt of a statement made by someone.

kwchang
21-07-2014, 11:51 PM
The ban on mecure is only temporary - for him to cool off
The basic problem here is that mecure is up to his old habits again when he was Rhiga.
He tend to take things into his own hands and decide to "moderate" the thread
This lead to arguments and people getting angry for being chastised or accused of doing something as observed by mecure

In the past, I used to just give banana but I feel it is more effective with temporary ban

Please note - I do not check everything that is posted
But if anyone things they feel strongly about posts done by another member, just report to me
instead of doing my job of moderating

How to report - just click on the warning triangle (triangle with the exclaimation mark "!" inside) found at the bottom gray border of the particular post

Do take note that I view things differently
If you report a post, it does not mean I will agree with your observation
Just as in this case i do not see anything wrong with the comment by besitai2007...he only forgot to emphasis that it was possibly a rumor but the linked article already said so. Furthermore, besitai2007 only said he believes the CEO is on his way out because of besitai2007's observation that only someone on the way out is brave enough to stand up and oppose the boss

I do not see why mecure was so angry about that...it is either simply being nit-picking or mecure dislike comments by besitai2007 (as was in a previous encounter)

kwchang
22-07-2014, 12:02 AM
To all members concerned

My way of moderation is pretty simple

Basically it is to moderate on arguments
Anyone who starts a fight will have to face the consequences

in a public forum, we always agree to disagree
that is, to respect the other person's view
you may oppose but learn to do it without confrontation or getting personal such as accusing the other party of spreading rumors or lying
let the admin do the job of reprimanding a wrong-doer ... don't try to do the mod's role here

Sentinel
22-07-2014, 01:52 AM
So, we gonna have another "hotel" opening soon? :mua-haha:

tupai
22-07-2014, 08:39 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEpI7t22DVo

thgis will be !Do enjoy your checking in :-) What a great Tuesday this is to be!

tan_r
22-07-2014, 10:12 AM
Pardon me but i do not see any attempt to moderate by mencure. I see only a debate ongoing.


Mecure was displeased with a comment made by besitai2007 and started to "moderate"
Admin had taken action on this and moved the arguments out to the moderation thread - link (http://www.usj.com.my/bulletin/upload/showthread.php?37417-harassment-in-the-thread-on-Petronas-CEO)

Dervish
23-07-2014, 12:49 PM
Pardon me but i do not see any attempt to moderate by mencure. I see only a debate ongoing.

Agree. All I saw was mercure raising a bunch of questions. I am surprised to see such a harsh response from the Mighty Mod. It isn't as if this is something new.

And how sure are you that this is Rhiga?

Mercure
29-07-2014, 11:04 AM
Chang, I don’t think you need to ban Mercure. I guess he has the right to get to the bottom of a rumour and nothing wrong to question if it is in doubt of a statement made by someone.


Pardon me but i do not see any attempt to moderate by mencure. I see only a debate ongoing.


Agree. All I saw was mercure raising a bunch of questions. I am surprised to see such a harsh response from the Mighty Mod. It isn't as if this is something new.




I think this comment from Chang is the best description about himself...



.. this is where some of you do not realise how you actually disrobe in public and display everything about yourself for all to see. ... Take a step back and see yourselves from a different position...read what you wrote and become the public and look at yourself..

I hope some of you realise that you had walked naked in front of all your friends on the Forum and did not realise how much you had exposed yourselves.


He did not realize that he had become the classic example of what he described others...

He had just revealed himself and walked naked in front of other forumers. It is time for him to take a step back and see himself from a different position...