Using forum to spread rumour by trying to confirm them here

[pcyeoh]

It is terribly unjust and wrong to spread such a rumour and you are spreading a rumour. Not only is your post in very poor taste but you are insulting the memory of the girl.

You are trying to fan a non-existing fire in the Kedah case by bringing in totally unsubstantiated materials and now you are trying to justify yourself by saying you want more concrete proof? You can get concrete proof by lighting and fanning a fire? Yeah. I also keep on hearing people mentioning that if you cross breed an imbecile with another imbecile, you will produce an Einstein.

I agree with the above statement by Jose Mourinho. Unfortunately he has been misunderstood by his last statement and was accused of slandering and got bananaed (by now he has overtaken Joe Gomez on this) when he was not referring to anyone in particular when he used the word 'imbecile.' He was not even implying anything at all.

I suggest that forumers should not post in this forum unsubstantiated statements and negative speculations what we term as rumours or hearsay and then ask people here whether we have heard of them. By doing so, the forumer unfortunately is actually spreading the rumour on a greater and faster scale unknowingly. I found that in some of the past postings, they have tarnished the image of the person or the organisations who are unfortunate enough to be absent from here to defend themselves. In the court of law, the lawyers would have objected and asked the court to expunge such heresay.

[Joe Gomez]

...................and got bananaed (by now he has overtaken Joe Gomez on this) ..................Always wanted to be benchmarked for something or other ... anything at all ........ Being bananaed shd do it ........ thks pc ..... :D

[orchipalar]

http://www.usj.com.my/bulletin/upload/showpost.php?p=152679&postcount=19

http://www.usj.com.my/bulletin/upload/showpost.php?p=152772&postcount=25

http://www.usj.com.my/bulletin/upload/showpost.php?p=152779&postcount=27

http://www.usj.com.my/bulletin/upload/showpost.php?p=152804&postcount=31

Err...dear PCYeoh:)...you may have misunderstood...our fellow forumer is sent to the banana plantation again...after he resorted to name calling fellow forumers Arbiter n to similar extent Handyman...as a Canis...as in a fox...wolf n a dog...n as badly to the previous extent of slandering the earlier fellow forumer...

Ahem...irrespective of your concern of rumour spreading is bad which Orchi tends to agree with you on that point ONLY...the matter could have easily been avoided...IF the fellow forumer concerned...would have just given off a gentle caution of it instead...to begin with.

[Jose Mourinho]

....after he resorted to name calling fellow forumers Arbiter n to similar extent Handyman...as a Canis...as in a fox...wolf n a dog...n as badly to the previous extent of slandering the earlier fellow forumer...

I just quoted you but I shall not lower my self dignity and respect to even answer your usual psuedo-wisdom.

KWChang mentioned that (perhaps) I like the banana plantation. Janelim also mentioned in one of her posts that I have received a lot of bananas. PCYeoh mentioned it also. Joe Gomez indirectly mentioned it also. Actually, what is a banana? It is worth something if it is worth something but when a banana or a ban is dished out on selective persecution basis, then it is a joke on the person who dishes them out. It is of no consequence to me.

And I thank you, Orchipalar, not to reply me and make references to my post (I believe your good friend KWChang did mention once that if we don't like each other's posts, then don't read and don't comment and so far I have stayed away from you as if you have leprosy - whether you have or not is of no consequence to me) because your hysteria doesn't impress nor interest me.

:)

[Jose Mourinho]

I still want to stress on rumour-mongering:


say does anyone know what happened to the Kedah girl who went jogging, got raped and killed case?

Rumours has it that some VIP's son tried courting her but he failed.
so he hired few guys to kidnap her.
then this VIP's son raped her and so did the gang and then later killed her.
rumours has it that since he cannot have her, no one else could....

sigh! that's rumous but has anyone hear of this same rumour ?

I will now follow the exact pattern posted by this rumour monger (noted that I said 'monger' and not 'mongrel'):


say does anyone know what happened to the tweedle-dee and tweedle-dum who went jogging, got raped and killed case?

Rumours has it that some VIP's son who is a gay tried courting them but he failed so he hired a few guys to kidnap them.
then this VIPS's son raped them and so did the gang and then later killed them. rumours has it that since he cannot have them, no one else could...

sigh! that's rumous but has anyone hear of this same rumour ?

I can start a rumour on any forumer (for example, a rumour on KWChang and Orchi in a banana plantation, or anybody in this world and then justify myself by saying that I just want to ask so that I can have concrete proof and that usj.forum is the place where I can get answers before and the admin/mod will be so overwhelmed with this shallow praise then he goes along with it? Same as he went along with Swee-Ann and actually said that he/she was right and I was wrong to disagree with him/her. I quoted from KWChang's post : "Jose. To be fair, swee-ann was probably trying to get answers as she had clarified earlier that she realised that usj dot com had answers for another similar incident"

Yes. People who doesn't understand the word 'fairness' should never utter it in case it blows up in his face.

:)

[janelim]

I appreciate all the help that members of the Forum (including you) are giving me to moderate the Forum but there need to be clear delineations of job-specifications. It may appear that I am sleeping on the job but I assure you that my style of administration is still my style. At the end of the day, the problems will be tackled. Hence I do appreciate some level of patience. If at any one time, you think I have missed a dismeanor, do PM me - the mechanics of the process are provided. Please leave me to handle the people who go off track or make unsavoury statements. My final decision may not be exactly to your liking but then, we can't have everything exactly the way we want it. ------- by kwchang

kwchang, you misread Jose's post again. Many times you failed in this area of misinterpretation. Jose was having a disagreement with swee-ann. But you jumped the gun again (as usual) and gave the impression that he is after your job. You can hold on tight to your moderator post...but insecurity keeps you jumping up and down.
And may I know what makes you think that swee-ann is a "she".???

[ericchan]

The only time i venture into this part of the forum when i find the other sections of the forum boring and dry.

[Ginger]

I still want to stress on rumour-mongering:

I will now follow the exact pattern posted by this rumour monger (noted that I said 'monger' and not 'mongrel'):

I can start a rumour on any forumer (for example, a rumour on KWChang and Orchi in a banana plantation, or anybody in this world and then justify myself by saying that I just want to ask so that I can have concrete proof and that usj.forum is the place where I can get answers before and the admin/mod will be so overwhelmed with this shallow praise then he goes along with it? Same as he went along with Swee-Ann and actually said that he/she was right and I was wrong to disagree with him/her. I quoted from KWChang's post : "Jose. To be fair, swee-ann was probably trying to get answers as she had clarified earlier that she realised that usj dot com had answers for another similar incident"

Yes. People who doesn't understand the word 'fairness' should never utter it in case it blows up in his face.


You repeatedly use the forum for your own selfish purposes and ill intentions stooping so low as to attack the moderators and forumers with your so called sarcastic & intelligent "wisdom", rather than addressing the issues amicably & conducting yourself properly. I can only see you as a trouble maker, nothing that you can say that will refute that reality!

But you are so lucky that you cd still exist in this forum, outside of which, tables & chairs wd be flying for sure!


:D

[Clark Kent]

You repeatedly use the forum for your own selfish purposes and ill intentions stooping so low as to attack the moderators and forumers with your so called sarcastic & intelligent "wisdom", rather than addressing the issues amicably & conducting yourself properly. I can only see you as a trouble maker, nothing that you can say that will refute that reality!

But you are so lucky that you cd still exist in this forum, outside of which, tables & chairs wd be flying for sure!


:D

Cut the crap. You have an issue with Jose Mourinho, please Private Message him or the Administrator directly. This forum, I believe, is not meant for you to pursue your personal vendetta in whatever nickname you use. I read a lot about trolls and I certainly hope you're not one, be it sanctioned or unsanctioned. I'm not playing moderator. You should not play judge.

[pcyeoh]

You repeatedly use the forum for your own selfish purposes and ill intentions stooping so low as to attack the moderators and forumers with your so called sarcastic & intelligent "wisdom", rather than addressing the issues amicably & conducting yourself properly. I can only see you as a trouble maker, nothing that you can say that will refute that reality!

But you are so lucky that you cd still exist in this forum, outside of which, tables & chairs wd be flying for sure!


:D

er er er...r another MCA meeting?? But the origin of flying chairs and tables belongs to the MIC. Sorry for the slight digression. It is also said that the good old days MIC had a 150% attendance everytime they held a meeting to discuss controversial issue - 100% from the members themselves and 50% from the FRU Police squad. Whether the tradition is carry on today will be seen at this weekend MIC Annual General Meeting which incidentally is also a election year.

[idolfan]

the way its going , very soon moderators would have no choice but tighten up the registration procedures.

[mon]

the way its going , very soon moderators would have no choice but tighten up the registration procedures.

Great idea idolfan :)

[Ginger]

the way its going , very soon moderators would have no choice but tighten up the registration procedures.

Yes. One of de way is to use house/office phone registration. Only de administrators hv access to the phone numbers. Just a suggestion. Rather than having someone creating dozens of nicks to create nothing but trouble!


:D

[Clark Kent]

Rather than having someone creating dozens of nicks to create nothing but trouble!

You mean like maybe Mon (nice girl) could be Ginger (nasty girl) and vice versa, and maybe many more girly or manly nicks?

Just a rough example with you as an exhibit if you don't mind. I'm sure you don't. Sorry if you do. :)

[Ginger]

You mean like maybe Mon (nice girl) could be Ginger (nasty girl) and vice versa, and maybe many more girly or manly nicks?

Just a rough example with you as an exhibit if you don't mind. I'm sure you don't. Sorry if you do. :)

I hope you don't mean to slander me. I'm not about to waste my time on you. Please do not accuse me of somebody whom I'm not. You yourself should stop hallucinating.

[KakiLang]

Another example, hope u dun mind too.. :D

U could be Superman & at the same time u could be Lux Luther... :D

[Clark Kent]

Another example, hope u dun mind too.. :D

U could be Superman & at the same time u could be Lux Luther... :D

No la...being Clark Kent is hard enough. I wouldn't want to be Lex Luthor and be worried sick that my cover is blown, twice over both as Supe and Lex. Remember Two-Face, the baddie in Batman? I think he was killed or something. Nasty. So I don't believe in having multiple covers. :D

[Clark Kent]

I hope you don't mean to slander me. I'm not about to waste my time on you. Please do not accuse me of somebody whom I'm not. You yourself should stop hallucinating.

So sorry (once again) if you're not Mon. I did say it was a rough example.

I hope you will stay on as Ginger. I like your 'cut the crap' phrase and would hope you stay on to say that more often. To others instead of me la, of course. :D

[handyman]

So I don't believe in having multiple covers. - Clark Kent


1. SunGod
2. Arbitory
3. hitchcock
4. mrs. wong
5. kamikaze
6. merinoskin
7. wisdommay5
8. bugfly
9. wearealuep
10. chrisbachang
11. elegantmaiden
12. chili padi
13. honorious
14. organza
15. mon-key
16. lord arbi
17. astrokia
18. lengho
19. john michael
20. cindy kee
21. cool hand luke
22. ck one
23. michael corleone
24. etc
25. etc
26. clark kent

= ???? ????????

just a rough example with you/your good friends as exhibits if you don't mind. I'm sure you don't. Sorry if you do. :D

[Joe Gomez]

[B]....................And may I know what makes you think that swee-ann is a "she".???Ya lor ..... & for the same reason I cld not undertand why a joker who has since been banned for good ( good riddance ) chastised me for being rude to you as you are a lady ........... like it was ok to be rude to a male !!!!???? :confused:
I wonder what made that joker so sure that you are a lady ...... hmmm. Was it purely cos your nick sounds ladylike ..... I wonder ???? For that matter, what makes anyone think I am a male purely cos I use the nick Joe Gomez ???? I cld be a female with a male inside me fighting to get out ....... !!!!
orchi & pc, dont you dare go the "she-male" :eek: :eek: way ............ :D

[Joe Gomez]

So I don't believe in having multiple covers. - Clark Kent


1. SunGod
2. Arbitory
3. hitchcock
4. mrs. wong
5. kamikaze
6. merinoskin
7. wisdommay5
8. bugfly
9. wearealuep
10. chrisbachang
11. elegantmaiden
12. chili padi
13. honorious
14. organza
15. mon-key
16. lord arbi
17. astrokia
18. lengho
19. john michael
20. cindy kee
21. cool hand luke
22. ck one
23. michael corleone
24. etc
25. etc
26. clark kent

= ???? ????????

just a rough example with you/your good friends as exhibits if you don't mind. I'm sure you don't. Sorry if you do. :DHave we met anyone on this list at a TT session ??? & btw, why am I not on this list ......... ?????? :mad: ;) ;)

[janelim]

[QUOTE=handyman

1. SunGod
2. Arbitory
3. hitchcock
4. mrs. wong
5. kamikaze
6. merinoskin
7. wisdommay5
8. bugfly
9. wearealuep
10. chrisbachang
11. elegantmaiden
12. chili padi
13. honorious
14. organza
15. mon-key
16. lord arbi
17. astrokia
18. lengho
19. john michael
20. cindy kee
21. cool hand luke
22. ck one
23. michael corleone
24. etc
25. etc
26. clark kent

= ???? ????????

just a rough example with you/your good friends as exhibits if you don't mind. I'm sure you don't. Sorry if you do. :D[/QUOTE]

Assumption is the lowest level of intelligence. If our "jump-the-gun" moderator allows the leeway for multiple nicks, who are you to do such a tedious search and get so uptight about it?
Aiseh, i forgotten that you are the so-called sanctioned troll for our moderator and he gave you all the answers...bravo..!! :D

[Jose Mourinho]

You repeatedly use the forum for your own selfish purposes and ill intentions stooping so low as to attack the moderators and forumers with your so called sarcastic & intelligent "wisdom", rather than addressing the issues amicably & conducting yourself properly. I can only see you as a trouble maker, nothing that you can say that will refute that reality!

But you are so lucky that you cd still exist in this forum, outside of which, tables & chairs wd be flying for sure!

Dear Ginger. When I logged on and found such a venomous outpour of tormented screechings from the very depth of your soul, I knew that you have to be somebody I knew. I did not know of any Ginger and thus that must be a nick of somebody I knew. I could only think of two possibilities.

The first one was that you must be that woman. I must now inform everybody here that if you are that particular woman, then you have every right to be pouring turds from your painted mouth. I do apologize for calling you a mongrel bitch in heat in the Italian restaurant we went to that night. It was especially bad when there were so many diners around and they all turned and stared at you. But then you must admit that you did deserve it for trying to grab the crotch of the handsome waiter who walked by.

Secondly, you do not know me and I do not know you at all. If that is the case, then you must a) either doing it because you felt so hurt by my remarks on your little gods, KWChang or Orchi, or b) you are psychotic and you feel like to whack a stranger for no reason whatsoever. If that is the case, I really do think that you need to make an appointment with a psychiatrist. Your symptons of uncontrollable rage cannot be good for your health and certainly not for your state of mind.

Now. I cannot take any responsibility for your deranged screaming in a public forum if it is the second situation. But if it is the first situation, then I can tell you here and now that there is not a chance in hell that I would ever be your friend again and allowed you to force me to take you to any public place. This is not because of the crotch grabbing incident that night but I have also heard from my friends that you have done other quite unimaginable things which I cannot mention here as there are children viewing this forum.

For whatever it is, dear Ginger, take a deep breath and swallow 2 panadols and go to sleep. If that fails, take a razor blade and slit both wrists. Then we can get Swee-Ann to come in and spread some rumours about you. Fair enough? See? I have been exceedingly polite. At least I did not screech like a demented banshee.

Thank you all.

:)

[joker2107]

honorable banana man, somtinz jus aint rite here. wev got sumbody admittin' 2 a rumour n yet demandin' an answer! :(

A RUMOUR IS A RUMOUR AND RUMOURS NEED NO AFFIRMATION EXCEPT FOR ITCHY BITCHY BUSYBODIES WITH NO OTHER PURPOSE IN LIFE OR PERHAPS THEY ARE UNDERCOVER INVESTIGATORS. :mad: :mad: :mad:

d pursuit of rumour mongering in this honorable forum has adulterated d decorum n decimated d dignity herein. i m really pissed off by the immature attitudes which seems 2 b overpowering d maturity n sanctity of d original usj dot com DOT MY (dot my very very very important - i think u missed this in one of your earlier post :D )

[janelim]

Rumor mongering deserves the ISA....behind bars in Pulau Jerejak.
So why is it that our moderator didnt do anything about it, but instead penalised the wrong victim.

Pls apologise Mr Moderator.....or you are going to have more ITCHY BITCHY BUSYBODIES screeeching their souls out and going into asylum.

:mad:

[kwchang]

It does not matter what Jose say to me on the Forum because I cannot be fair to everyone. Jose obviously thinks I am unfair and for that I do apologise to him. However, let me tell you that Jose is a super intellect. He does have above-average intelligence and he does use it to the max. He moves within the limits of our rules, thinking that the moderator would not take action because if it happens, he will then try to convince everyone that I am a dictator and selectively finding fault with him. Very clever and may I say touche. Since this has deteriorated to this level, I will not play fair.

As a moderator, will not allow him to say things about members of the forum as they are our guests. I do not own this Forum nor do Jose. I have been given a job and I will do my job to the best of my ability. As I had said many times before, I do not care who is behind the nick. Whatever decision I make is not personal but situational. Hence if trouble starts or when members of the forum feel uneasy, I will have to restore peace.

I have also noticed that when I ban Jose, we do get a number of new nicks coming on to blast on the Forum. That is only an observation and I hope I am wrong.

I sincerely hope that members of the forum refrain from patronising those new nicks if they start flame wars. No need to provide fuel for them to burn. I am not fast but I will bet to them eventually.

I have banned Jose again, this time for a longer period. If he wants to come back, he will have to check when the door opens.

[janelim]

It does not matter what Jose say to me on the Forum because I cannot be fair to everyone. Jose obviously thinks I am unfair and for that I do apologise to him. However, let me tell you that Jose is a super intellect. He does have above-average intelligence and he does use it to the max. He moves within the limits of our rules, thinking that the moderator would not take action because if it happens, he will then try to convince everyone that I am a dictator and selectively finding fault with him. Very clever and may I say touche. Since this has deteriorated to this level, I will not play fair.

As a moderator, will not allow him to say things about members of the forum as they are our guests. I do not own this Forum nor do Jose. I have been given a job and I will do my job to the best of my ability. As I had said many times before, I do not care who is behind the nick. Whatever decision I make is not personal but situational. Hence if trouble starts or when members of the forum feel uneasy, I will have to restore peace.

I have also noticed that when I ban Jose, we do get a number of new nicks coming on to blast on the Forum. That is only an observation and I hope I am wrong.

I sincerely hope that members of the forum refrain from patronising those new nicks if they start flame wars. No need to provide fuel for them to burn. I am not fast but I will bet to them eventually.

I have banned Jose again, this time for a longer period. If he wants to come back, he will have to check when the door opens.

Mr kwchang. I beg your pardon.....!!!!
Jose did not convince me totally. I have my own brains to do my own postings here. I know its a hard day for you in the office, but could you for the life of it .....go through the postings......
It was that ITCHY BITCHY lady who came in screeching her soul out in defending orchi and you. What has it got to do with Jose????

It was Ginger who came in and attacked Jose with those venomous words and you ban Jose??? For the life of it... :mad:

You have done wrong again this time.. :mad:

[kwchang]

This is amazing. All I did was send a private message to Janelim but she chose to reply me in public. I am puzzled.

As for who is right or wrong, I had already clarified my stand. I cannot go around banning EVERYONE. Hence, I ask of the members not to get involved with baits to arguements. Some of you just got to stop getting involved.

[janelim]

This is amazing. All I did was send a private message to Janelim but she chose to reply me in public. I am puzzled.

As for who is right or wrong, I had already clarified my stand. I cannot go around banning EVERYONE. Hence, I ask of the members not to get involved with baits to arguements. Some of you just got to stop getting involved.

Why puzzled? I am standing on my Post Nos 22 and 25. It has nothing to do with your so called private messages. They are not private afterall...

What happened to those inciting in their posts? are you not taking action?
- handyman/Ginger/etc...cos they are sanctioned by you.
funny ya, Mr kwchang? :confused:

[Ginger]

Alright, I have to confess, I adore the kind peoples that surround me, I am in love and passionate about the peoples that are close to me, but I am faithful only to the women in my life(yes there were those times when the pretentious and sexual predatory older men who often squeezed my butt).

Plenty men are bad news, especially when there is one which has just gotten himself banned, as the worst example how extremely agressive, nasty, desperate and irrational a man can get to be so hard up for little pathetic attentions and scornful pity from the rest.

By the way, I am intoxicated by mother nature's wonders. I do love cartoons, gentle animals or even creatures of imaginations, and particularly though, I love my cats and dogs very much, but I guess I have seen many love sicked pussy cats and puppy dogs in my life which were still farther from being that bad by comparisons with the particular examples.

[joker2107]

i got a pm asking my opinion if sweeann deserved a warning or if she deserved 2 b attacked. (this forumer is certain sasaran kami adalah wanita.) i m replying publicly without naming who pmed me cos i think far 2 many of u read post by post s separate stories n fail 2 see d whole wide picture in d way as i summarise below :

chang admitted "the thread is about CCTV identifying a rapist"

but sweeann went totally out of context with her rumourmongering in http://www.usj.com.my/bulletin/upload/showpost.php?p=152674&postcount=18 :eek: :( :mad:

jose was very direct in his advice "Please act with more responsibility and stop fantasizing. Such a dark fantasy is obscene" - post 19 before i came in with kinder words http://www.usj.com.my/bulletin/upload/showpost.php?p=152689&postcount=21

but sweeann was adamant on fanning d fire n playing up her blunder with 3 subsequent posts: 22 - 24, ending with a pathetic denial of rumour mongering. :mad:

then, horror of horrors, chang signed a blank chq by saying "To be fair, swee-ann was probably trying to get answers as she had clarified earlier that she realised that usj dot com had answers for another similar incident". :confused:

there aint no answers 4 rumours. rumours must b plugged n flushed down d toilet bowl prompto. non negotiable. period. :mad: :(

d way sweeann demanded clarification, i m sure if jose n i n d others did not step in he/she'd hv asked if indeed there was penetration. this is not a presumption on my part - its written loud n clear in d line of "querying". perhaps bananaman realised this too n thats why he quoted "that she realised that usj dot com had answers". :)

ps 1 - chang seems certain sweeann is female.

ps 2 - note that d holey objectives of usj dot com r forbidden in this holier forum. ;)

in my final analysis, if sweeann had disintegrated after my post #21, a warning, not necessarily banana, shud hv been quite in order. after preposterous attempts 2 justify a sin, d floodgates 4 bombardment gave way.

[wewa25]

I have been observing the threads and I got to admit that it is really hard to judge comments/posts/threads by their face value. Imho, I do think that threads/posts do need to substantiate its facts by including some references to the 'references'. It is a thread starter/poster's right to post anything that he/she wants but do observe the fact that rumor-mongering is rife in public forums. If the claims can be substantiated, then do post with a reference. It will certainly lessen the confusion and will help streamline usj.com.my a lot.

Interesting/debatable threads were posted but do try not to fuel the threads too much, some people might get burned. Thus, creating all these confusion and etc.

To all, just hope everything will settle down in good time.

[kpc]

Chang was wrong to have banned Jose again.
If he wanted peace forevermore,
he should have banned kpc, janelim, pcyeoh, joker and anybody else who dares to stand up and speak out for what is right.

Seems like handyman is Orchi's close relative, speaks like him without the Err and "...."

I propose to give him the "Official Troll" title under his nick.
Anybody want to second this proposal?

[Joe Gomez]

............... I propose to give him the "Official Troll" title under his nick.
Anybody want to second this proposal?Hai Baghwan !!! another poll in the offing ...... ????? :eek: ;)

[KakiLang]

Chang was wrong to have banned Jose again.
If he wanted peace forevermore,
he should have banned kpc, janelim, pcyeoh, joker and anybody else who dares to stand up and speak out for what is right.

Seems like handyman is Orchi's close relative, speaks like him without the Err and "...."

I propose to give him the "Official Troll" title under his nick.
Anybody want to second this proposal?

....and I oso think u look like someone in this forum....u know..."Birds of a feather flock together"?? :p

[kwchang]

My thanks to joker2107 for putting out the case
As I have said b4, I am slow.
Now in retrospect i do see the root of the problem
Hence a number of bananas are due -

banana for swee_ann_tweety - for rumour ( in "Which shopping centre in Damansara?")

I did tell you people not to engage in flame wars. Like what girl2 did ...

banana for girl2 - for name calling - (#49 in "Mon is Julian72, girl2, babe, Ginger. Judge for yourself")

[Joe Gomez]

My thanks to joker2107 for putting out the case
As I have said b4, I am slow.
Now in retrospect i do see the root of the problem
Hence a number of bananas are due -

girl2 - for name calling - (#49 in "Mon is Julian72, girl2, babe, Ginger. Judge for yourself")
swee_ann_tweety - for rumour ( in "Which shopping centre in Damansara?")

more to come, add to this list laterWherefore wert thou my friend ????

[kwchang]

I have to work ... what, you think I moderate the whole day?

[Joe Gomez]

I have to work ... what, you think I moderate the whole day?Ahhhhhhhhh ............ I am glad you set that right ..... many people on this forum have the mistaken notion that you have no other life !!!!!! ;)

[janelim]

Ahhhhhhhhh ............ I am glad you set that right ..... many people on this forum have the mistaken notion that you have no other life !!!!!! ;)

How many holidays do you think Kwchang deserved??
He just had a good time with his family in Kuantan staying in Hyatt.. :)

btw thanks chang for recommending the stuffed crab shells..delicious at Pak Su Seafood Restaurant @ rm5.50 each. They were wonderful.

[Mr Sloan]

If our "jump-the-gun" moderator allows....

Another term for it is prematured ejaculation. I'm sure Chang knows what is very familiar with it. Poor guy.

[Mr Sloan]

Chang was wrong to have banned Jose again.
If he wanted peace forevermore,
he should have banned kpc, janelim, pcyeoh, joker and anybody else who dares to stand up and speak out for what is right.

Seems like handyman is Orchi's close relative, speaks like him without the Err and "...."

I propose to give him the "Official Troll" title under his nick.
Anybody want to second this proposal?

I second the proposal.

[janelim]

I dont care whether its called prematured ejaculation or prematured erection.
Dont misunderstand me. All I am saying is he made a wrong decision.

If I make a wrong decision in this office here it costs me by hundreds of thousands...sh!t.

[Mr Sloan]

I dont care whether its called prematured ejaculation or prematured erection.
Dont misunderstand me. All I am saying is he made a wrong decision.

If I make a wrong decision in this office here it costs me by hundreds of thousands...sh!t.

My apologies to you, Lady.

[kpc]

Chang,

I think you forgot to banana handyman for inciting.

Thanks.

[Joe Gomez]

............. My apologies to you, Lady.Hi Mr Sloan, u know janelim meh ??
U know janelim is a lady meh ? :confused:
Thanks for clearing that up. :p
I dont care whether its called prematured ejaculation or prematured erection.
Dont misunderstand me. All I am saying is he made a wrong decision.

If I make a wrong decision in this office here it costs me by hundreds of thousands...sh!t.Sure lady one ah ???

We should all meet at the next TT and clear all doubts for posterity !!!! ;) :p
For the "lady's" info no erection can ever be too premature ...... the faster one rises to the occassion, the better lor !!! ;) ............. or maybe u have not witnessed a standing ovation of that sort meh ?? :D

[Mr Sloan]

We should all meet at the next TT and clear all doubts for posterity !!!! ;) :p
For the "lady's" info no erection can ever be too premature ...... the faster one rises to the occassion, the better lor !!! ;) ............. or maybe u have not witnessed a standing ovation of that sort meh ?? :D

You are sick. Official Online Uneducated Gangster. What a Sick Low-Life Pervert. Chang should ban him for this crude and suggestive remark.

[Mr Sloan]

Chang,

I think you forgot to banana handyman for inciting.

Thanks.

Chang. I also think you forgot to ban MENTALLY SICK JOE GOMEZ. Thanks.

[Joe Gomez]

You are sick. Official Online Uneducated Gangster. What a Sick Low-Life Pervert. Chang should ban him for this crude and suggestive remark.An astute observation, my dear Watson. And for the following from you, pray tell us, you would suggest chang do what ?
Another term for it is prematured ejaculation. I'm sure Chang knows what is very familiar with it. Poor guy....... and for the following, very lady like :D , comment from Lady Jane ...... ?????
I dont care whether its called prematured ejaculation or prematured erection.Dont misunderstand me. All I am saying is he made a wrong decision.

If I make a wrong decision in this office here it costs me by hundreds of thousands...sh!t.For such incomparable prose from the both of you DHL would have quite rightly accorded you the accolades of "Lady Jane" and "John Thomas" respectively ...... and deservedly, so if I may be permitted to add.
Should the entire forum now give both of you a standing ovation ??? ;) .. your Lady Jane will be seeing it for the first time wouldnt she ??

Try not to rupture a blood vessel ....